| Date of Coming |
: 2022-08-10 |
| Auther |
: Ahmed Osman |
| Section |
: History of the Jews |
| Size of file |
: 3.77MB |
| Language |
: English |
| Department |
: History |
| book quality |
: Good |
| Number of Pages |
: 129 |
Author: Ahmed Osman
About the Author: Ahmed Osman is an Egyptian-born author. He has put forward a number of theories, some revisionist in nature, about Ancient Egypt and the origins of Judaism and Christianity. Born in 1934 in the Cairene district of Abdin, Osman was educated at Al-Khedewiya School and the University of Ain Shams, where he read law. After graduation he worked as a journalist, first with Akhbar Al-Yom, which he joined as a young trainee. Yet, even though journalism offered a secure career, Osman preferred the far less certain vocation of playwrighting. His first play, The Sin of a God, was inspired by Greek mythology. A Zeus-like god falls in love with a human who bears him a son who is an amalgam of god and man. His second play, Rebel in the Harem, resembles the tales of One Thousand and One Nights . His Sheherezade incites a rebellion in the harem resulting in the mass release of the concubines. His third play, Where is Paradise?, borrowed liberally from Exodus. The moral of the story? Had the Israelites accepted Egypt as their homeland they would have lived happily ever after. Osman’s four plays have never been staged in Egypt. A fifth, Hollow in the Sky, was performed at London’s Little Theatre Club in 1967. His controversial books, though, have been far more enthusiastically received. In December 1964 Osman left Egypt for good. He first moved to Paris then to London where he studied Egyptology. Hypotheses: His first hypothesis was that Joseph was the father-in-law of Amenhotep III, Yuya. In 1987 this claim provided the basis for his first book, Stranger in the Valley of the Kings. Osman identified the Semitic-born Egyptian official Joseph with the Egyptian official Yuya, and asserted the identification of Hebrew liberator Moses with the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten. Ahmed Osman has also claimed that Moses and Akhenaten were the same person, supporting his belief by interpreting aspects of biblical and Egyptian history. He alleges that Atenism can be considered monotheistic and related to Judaism, and includes other similarities, including a ban on idol worship and the similarity of the name Aten to the Hebrew Adon, or “Lord”. This would mesh with Osman’s other claim that Akhenaten’s maternal grandfather Yuya was the same person as the Biblical Joseph. A number of Osman’s positions are in conflict with mainstream Egyptology, including conventional Egyptian chronology. Some Egyptologists have gone as far as rejecting them as unacademic conjecture while others do not consider them worth refuting.Donald B. Redford wrote a scathing review of Stranger in the Valley of the Kings for Biblical Archaeology Review in which he wrote “The author treats the evidence as cavalierly as he pleases. He presents himself as a sober historian, yet when it suits him, the Biblical evidence is accepted at face value and literally… When the Biblical evidence does not suit Osman, it is discarded.” In his Christianity: An Ancient Egyptian Religion (2005), Osman claims that Christianity did not originate in Judea but is the remnant of an Ancient Egyptian mystery cult that was suppressed and transformed by the Roman authorities. He also argues that Jesus was not Jewish but was actually the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun and that there was no Joshua, just a confusion between the names Jesus and Joshua: “Up to the 16th century, when the Old Testament books were translated from the Mesoretic Hebrew text into modern European languages, Jesus was the name of the prophet who succeeded Moses as leader of the Israelites in Egypt. Since the 16th century we started to have two names, Jesus and Joshua, which confused people into the belief that they were two different characters”. Osman states that the reason mainstream Egyptologists do not accept his ideas is because “Egyptologists have established their careers on their interpretations” and that to accept other theories could give them less authority
The Egyptian Origins of King David and the Temple of SolomonThe Egyptian Origins of King David and the Temple of Solomon book pdf download By Ahmed Osman
“An investigation into the real historical figure of King David and the real location of the Temple of Solomon”–;”An investigation into the real historical figure of King David and the real location of the Temple of Solomon Identifies King David as Pharaoh Tuthmosis III of the 18th Dynasty and David’s son Solomon as Pharaoh Amenhotep, Tuthmosis’s successor Shows how the Temple of Solomon described in the Bible corresponds with the Mortuary Temple of Luxor in Egypt Explains how David was not a descendant of Isaac but his father and how biblical narrators changed the original story of Abraham and Isaac to hide his Egyptian identity During the last two centuries, thousands of ancient documents from different sites in the Middle East have been uncovered. However, no archaeological discovery speaks of King David or Solomon, his son and successor, directly or in directly. Was King David a real person or a legend like King Arthur? Proposing that David was a genuine historical figure, Ahmed Osman explores how his identity may be radically different than what is described in religious texts. Drawing on recent archaeological, historical, and biblical evidence from Egypt, Osman shows that David lived in Thebes, Egypt, rather than Jerusalem; that he lived five centuries earlier than previously thought, during the 15th rather than the 10th century B.C.; and that David was not a descendant of Isaac but was, in fact, Isaac’s father. The author also reveals David’s true Egyptian identity: Pharaoh Tuthmosis III of the 18th Dynasty. Confirming evidence from rabbinic literature that indicates Isaac was not Abraham’s son, despite the version provided in Genesis, Osman demonstrates how biblical narrators replaced David with Abraham the Hebrew to hide the Egyptian identity of Isaac’s father. He shows how Egyptian historical and archaeological sources depict figures that match David’s and Solomon’s known characteristics in many ways, including accounts of a great empire between the Euphrates and the Nile that corresponds with David’s empire as described in the Bible. Extending his research further, the author shows that King Solomon, King David’s son, corresponds in reality to Pharaoh Amenhotep, successor of Tuthmosis III, the pharaoh who stands out in the dynastic history of Egypt not only for his peaceful reign but also as the builder of the Temple of Luxor and the famed Mortuary Temple at Luxor, which matches the biblical descriptions of Solomon’s Temple. Unveiling the real history behind the biblical story of King David, Osman reveals that the great ancestor of the Israelites was, in fact, Egyptian”–;Introduction — 1.The man of God — 2.The two Davids — 3.The evidence of archaeology — 4.David’s empire — 5.The chosen one — 6.Sarah and the Pharaoh — 7.Jerusalem, City of David — 8.David and Bathsheba — 9.Goliath the giant — 10.Joseph’s dreams — 11.The dreamer Pharaoh — 12.Uniting the families of Egypt and Canaan — 13.The empire of the King of Peace — 14.The “lost” mines of Solomon — 15.Wisdom and magic — 16.The lost palace — 17.The temples of Solomon and Amenhotep III — 18.Secrets of the architect — 19.The birth and repression of gnosticism — Conclusion — Notes — Bibliography — Index.
Download PDF of The Egyptian Origins of King David and the Temple of SolomonThe Egyptian Origins of King David and the Temple of Solomon book pdf download By Ahmed Osman
-Adrian Agency Library
